While today’s smart PST systems – whether mechanical or electronic – are a giant leap forward from FST, each does have drawbacks and limitations. For example, mechanical positioners have limited diagnostic capabilities, and aren’t compatible with all valves types. Plus, they’re tricky to install, commission and service. Meanwhile, electronic PST systems need additional kit to run and can be expensive. Often, they also need additional infrastructure or software changes to communicate with the systems.
So how can operators ensure those ESD valves that have been static or dormant for many months will, in an emergency, meet the moment? And all in a way that simplifies PSTs, ensures safety, and decreases downtime? Well, I think the best way to illustrate this is with an actual real-life example from one of HSP’s customers – a major UK refinery on the east coast of England.
This particular plant had identified a number of its emergency shut down valves (ESDs) were prone to sticking when required to operate on demand. In part, this was due to their infrequent use and the high temperatures and pressures involved in their application. A major concern of the operator was the inability of the valves to safely perform a PST, without the fear of insufficient voltage to re-energise the SOVs after performing a PST on them. Obviously, this raised potential safety concerns if there was a real emergency.
To solve the problem, the refinery operator would need a super-reliable system to monitor the power to the solenoid valve and prevent it shutting the valve down due to insufficient power to re-energise the SOV after testing. Whatever the solution, it had to be easy to install and work with the plant’s existing infrastructure. It also had to be operable locally, or through a DCS, using simple Pass/Fail testing. And it had to be able to be tested by Operators with no training or specialist devices.